Abstract EN:

This research adopts the perspective of Halbwachs' collective memory to examine the factors influencing the mutation of the identity discourse and the literary intellectual's national identity at different periods. Even the existing studies indicate the politico-economic, epistemo-cultural and generational reasons about the sociogenese of the actual "desinisant" thought, they don't perfectly explicate "why" and "how" these identity discourses have transformed since the 1970s. The memorial effect is a important factor while we discus about the new Identity problem in Taiwan, it can offer us a good point of view to understand the "conflict of interpretation about Taiwan’s history between the "independentists" and the réunificationnistes”. Our study emphasis the fluidity and the heterogeneity of the politic conviction of literary and academic intellectuals during different periods. Through the "social epistemological framework". (cadres sociaux), we also indicate the reason of the fluctuation of some winters in their politic position; in the other side, we show how they revisit their precedent discourses today.