Abstract EN:

The study of enunciation of the paranoid schizophrenic can be useful in clinical psychology and in psycho-pathology. It doesn't allow, strictly, to educe some linguistic constants, which would specify a kind of talking. However, the particularisms of the use of certain linguistical forms nearly all put in obviousness a rupture between the subject of the wording and the subject of the enunciation. After doing a recall about the theories of the enunciation; a glimpse of the language's psychopathological thesis, on analyse of the conditions of accessibility to the language and some linguistical and psycho-pathological remarks about the symbolization, we'll introduce the questions of the methods of analyse of the oral talking constituting the corpus. It deals with a paraphrastical method which enters upon the oral text in its totality, in search of the laws of the proper functioning to the texts. The results insist essentially on the fact that the defaulting psychological organization of the psychotics has some repercussions on the linguistical indicatories : the use of the "self-i" is peculiar in the sense of its absence or of a too important insistence ; the use of the temporals and spatial deictics is inappropriate ; the anaphorical "that" is omnipresent ; the subject is not very engaged in the action of his talking. Furthermore, it appears thatthe linguistical sign is inconsistent ; something resists to the access of the signification. The semantical lapses, the textual ruptures, the entanglement of the narrative levels are risen to the rank of interlocutive strategy. In a word, the schizophrenic gives evidence in the handling of the linguistical tool of his permanent difficulty to distinguish the different instancies (entreaties) of enunciation