Abstract EN:

Freud speaks about the mysterious jump from the psychic to the somatic. I ask myself questions about this pathology, basing myself on clinical cases and on lacan's proposition to replace the term "psychosomatic", inadequately defined, by "epistemosomatic flaw", referring to the constituting of the subject, body and spoken words, talking about his enjoyment and his pleasure. As a psychologist, a doctor and a psychoanalyst, i study thoroughly the instinct concept, the in-between, the space between in the working out of the unconscious image of the body, its relation to the memory, the remembrance, the winnicottian illusion and disillusion, the lacanian dialectics ego-i, the naming, the identification, the "speaking child" by f. Dolto. For my part, medical semiology does not define the psychosomatic field. We must always place the symptom in the transferencial dimension to the other, in the look. Man speaks, confronted with the castration law presented by the phallic significans of the father's name, constructing himself between two risks: the repression providing hysteria and the forclosure originating the schizophrenic dissociation. The neurotic symptom is a compromise formation, the psychosomatic phenomenon is a localized mode of defence against the schizophrenic bursting, dissociated significans chain, diffracted mirror, impossible corporeity.