thesis

La pseudonégligence peut-elle rendre compte des asymétries de la perception de l'espace latéral en modalité tactilo-kinésthésique ?

Defense date:

Jan. 1, 1995

Edit

Disciplines:

Authors:

Directors:

Abstract EN:

Bowers and heilman (1980) observed that when righthanded adults were asked to locate, in the hapic modality, the midpoint of a horizontal line, both hands tended to deviate to the left of the true midpoint. This error, called "pseudoneglect" by reference to the rightward error of patients suffering from right posterior brain lesions, was also observed in vision and has been explained by hemispheric activation theories. Because bisection is spatial in nature, it would activate the right hemisphere and would therefore induce a left lateral shift of attention. In our research on bisection in the haptic modality of normal blindfolded and totally blind adults, we first replicated bowers and heilman's results (sampaio & philip, 1991). But further studies failed to confirm the existence of pseudoneglect. Actually, each hand tended to deviate in the contralateral space. In addition, when the direction of exploration of the line to be bisected was constrained (from left-to-right only, or from right-to-left), the responses were deviated in the direction of the arm movement. Finally, attentional priming of one end of the stimulus tended to deviate the subjective midpoint in the direction of the lateral cue. These results are discussed in relation to hemispheric activation theories and to the hypothesis assuming changes in the egocentric reference frame.

Abstract FR:

La pseudonegligence observee chez les normaux (bowers et heilman, 1980) consiste a repondre a gauche du centre objectif quand on demande de partager des lignes horizontales par le milieu. Certains l'expliquent par la nature spatiale de la tache qui, en activant l'hemisphere d, entrainerait un "surdimensionnement" de la partie g du stimulus. Mais son instabilite souligne aussi la puissance du biais d'orientation vers la d. D'autres pensent que le sens de l'exploration determine celui des deviations, ou invoquent un amorcage de l'attention du cote ou debute l'exploration. Nous avons teste l'hypothese de l'existence dans cette tache de composantes sensorielle et motrice s'exercant en sens inverse. Nos resultats ne confirment pas la pseudonegligence et ne montrent pas de difference entre les sujets aveugles et voyants. Chaque main devie dans l'hemiespace controlateral. D'autre part, si on impose toujours le meme sens d'exploration, les deviations suivent ce sens. Mais, lorsqu'on amorce lateralement l'attention avant l'exploration, les erreurs sont attirees du cote de l'amorcage. La discussion porte sur la theorie d'activation hemispherique et sur l'hypothese d'un decalage du referentiel egocentre.