La citoyenneté juridique
Institution:
Paris 2Disciplines:
Directors:
Abstract EN:
The legal citizenship is the participation in activities by which a person means to print in the legal frame his/her values, interests and aims, this person being linked to a great number of associations, each one promoting one aspect of his/her identity. It is a postmodern and postnational interpretation of citizenship, as plural access to creation, interpretation and application of legal norms. Through the analysis of different ways of gathering (trade unions, families, national and supranational institutions, non financial associations),of participating (lobbying, mediation, democracy) and of relating to an authority (political separation, proximity, representation) and to the the legal norms (acculturation, national laws, international law) in different countries (france, great britain, europe), two models of associations are specified: the homogeneous one and the heterogeneous one. By the first one is meant a group of persons volontarily taking place together in it, linked by a common element of identity (value, interest) they aim at transform in legal norms. The heterogeneous association is the result of interactions between homogeneous associations linked by the necessity of kiving together, having different values, interest and aims that each one intend to print in the law by public lobbying. The theorical background of this distinction is an interpretation of the analysis of politic and legal relations developped by j. -j. Rousseau, leading to withdraw dynamic and creative principles of interactions (circularity, dialectic of desires, extended autolegislation, neecessary cohabitation between the different kinds of associations, necessary participation to the general will).
Abstract FR:
La citoyennete juridique designe la participation a un ensemble d'activites a travers lesquelles une personne vise a faire inscrire dans le droit ses valeurs, interets et objectifs, en adherant a de multiples associations promouvant chacune un aspect de l'identite de cette personne. C'est une interpretation postmoderne et post-nationale de la citoyennete comme acces plurivoque a la creation, l'interpretation et l'application des normes juridiques. A travers l'analyse de differents modes d'agregation (associations sans but lucratif, syndicats, famille, institutions etatiques nationales et supraetatiques de l'europe) de participation (lobbying, mediation penale, democratie) et de rapport a l'autorite (separation des pouvoirs, proximite, representation) et aux normes (acculturation, droits nationaux, droit international) dans differents pays (france, grande bretagne, europe) sont degages deux types d'associations: l'association homogene et l'association heterogene. La premiere designe un ensemble de personnes liees par une appartenance volontaire et un element identitaire (valeur, interet) commun qu'elles ont pour objectif de transformer en statut juridique. L'association heterogene designe les interactions entre associations homogenes liees par une coexistence necessaire et de fait, et ayant des valeurs, interets et objectifs differents, qu'elles tentent chacune d'inscrire dans le droit en faisant pression aupres des autres au moyen de differentes activites de communication publique. Le fondement theorique de cette distinction consiste en une interpretation de l'analyse des relations politiques et juridiques developpee par J. -J. Rousseau, amenant a degager des principes d'interactions dynamiques et creatives (circularite, dialectique des desirs, auto-legislation large, coexistence necessaire entre differents modes d'association, participation necessaire a la volonte generale).