Abstract EN:

The abundance of criticism and stereotypes in all aspects of international financial relations constitutes truths that commentators deliver across "whitepapers" and media. It's precisely to challenge these attitudes that this essay examines objectivity problems in the analysis and economical policies concerning financial relations between developed countries and developing countries. Consequently, we have conducted our research in two main levels. First, at the intellectual level, we draw up the state and criticize stereotypes of international financial relations. This direction analyzes not only the bretton woods' system and the role of financial institutions such imf and world bank. It also analyzes strategies engaged by these institutions to manage the debt and to deal with the development of the developing countries. Therefore, this path allows to dress up the "credit" of the international financial relations. Secondly, at pragmatic level, we try to analyze insertion problems of the developing countries in world economy. At this level, we treat at the same time all economical, financial and commercial problems that the developing countries are facing by considering many facts or real cases and group of countries. So that, this path allows to dress up the "debit" of the international financial relations. Finally, in the general conclusion, we try to evaluate and assess the financial relations between developed countries and developing countries by examining the above credits and debits. These credits and debits are the impacts of the international financial relations on developing countries. Therefore, this evaluation that is a sorte of "balance sheet" shows that the considered financial relations are not fully positive for developing countries because the overall debit could be more important than the overall credit.