Genie et verite. Ontologie de la verite et metaphysique des createurs
Institution:
Lille 3Disciplines:
Directors:
Abstract EN:
Every practice and every theory suppose an implicite conception of trhuth which must be questionned not simply about his existence because of the juridical nature of this notion, but about the invention of its essence and the legityimacy of this invention. That gives a definition of the genius therefore the questions of truth and geniusity meet to gether, not as a positive reality but as a juridical necessity after the introduction which states the necessity for philosophy to create a definition of truth of which it will be the explication and therefore to be itself of genius, as tis history attests it, will be study the question of the nature of what is true by the creativity of genius, the works. These ones will be questionned about the worldly vanity they assume and about the legitimacy of its existence, the institution of which it is the next problem of the genius is to reconcile juridical relaity of its notion with the ontological nature of truth which is by definition substancial. The second part will be denoted to the development of knowledge which is necessasity involved geniusity the creator of genius must own the answer to the most fundamental questions of ontology and metaphysics we will clarify each question and we will bring out the answer involved by the notion of an absolutly legitimale speaker. The conclusion is about the notion of the person, subject of right and not of fact, as completely made of the "subconsqcious" supposition of what is truen and leads to a "psychianalysis of right".
Abstract FR:
Toute pratique et toute theorie suppose une conception implicite de la verite, qu'il faut interroger non pas simplement sur son existence a cause du caractere juridique de sa notion, mais sur l'invention de son essence, et la legitimite de cette invention. Ce qui definit le genie. La question de la verite se confond donc avec celle de la genialite non pas comme realite positive, psychologique ou existentielle, mais comme necessite juridique. Apres une introduction qui pose la necessite pour la philosophie d'inventer la definition de la verite dont elle sera l'explicitation et par consequent d'etre elle-meme geniale, ainsi que son histoire en est l'attestation, on aborde la question de la nature du vrai a travers celle de la realite geniale, l'oeuvre. Celle-ci est interrogee quant a la vanite mondaine qu'elle suppose et a la legitimite a exister dont elle est l'institution. Le probleme du genie est ensuite de concilier la realite purement juridique de sa notion avec le caractere strictement ontologique du vrai, par definition substantiel. La seconde partie est consacree au developpement du savoir qui se trouve necessairement implique dans la genialite : le createur genial doit forcement posseder la reponse aux questions les plus fondamentales de l'ontologie et de la metaphysique. On precise chacune de ces questions, et on degage la reponse impliquee par la notion d'un enonciateur "absolument legitime". La conclusion porte sur la notion de personne, sujet de droit et non de fait, comme entierement constituee de la supposition "inconsciente" du vrai