Corneille et le monologue : tradition et evolution
Institution:
Université Marc Bloch (Strasbourg) (1971-2008)Disciplines:
Directors:
Abstract EN:
The thesis deals with monologue in pierre corneille's plays. It is divided into two parts. In the first one, as an introduction to the investigation of corneille's plays, we have studied the building up of the tradition of monologue, t the practice of soliloquy from the greek tragic poets to alexandre hardy, corneille's nearest predecessor and also several writings on monologue in the seventeenth century (written by chapelain, d'aubignac, lamy and corneille himself). In the second part, we have examined how corneille first followed the tradition of monologue. In his comedies, the monologues are numerous and nearly play the same part as in hardy's pastorals. Later the number of monologues in corneille's dramas gradually diminishes until the monologue completely disappears in the last plays. We have studied how corneille replaces the monologue as greater importance is taken by the scenes with the confident. We have also tried to explain the meaning of this important change that was probably voluntarily made by corneille as well as the relation between the evolution of corneille's hero and the disappearance of monologue in his drama.
Abstract FR:
Le role que joue le monologue dans le theatre de corneille est caracterise a la fois par la permanence d'une tradition et par une evolution novatrice qui semble propre au poete. Le livre premier de la these est consacre a la naissance, au developpement de la tradition fort ancienne dont corneille a herite, et aux questions que l'existence meme du monologue a posees aux auteurs et aux theoriciens qui mediterent au xviie siecle sur le genre dramatique (chapelain, d'aubignac, lamy et corneille lui-meme). Dans le second livre est etudie ce que corneille a fait des usages qu'il a recueillis. Au cours de sa longue carriere, il est passe d'une fidelite a la tradition. Fidelite qui s'accompagnait deja de choix personnels (rejet du procede de l'ecoute, de la tirade-monologue), a un abandon progressif du monologue. Cet abandon, qui parait volontaire, n'est pas denue de sens. Il a sa source dans les gouts de corneille qui ne le portaient pas a abuser de l'emploi du monologue, mais aussi dans l'evolution du heros et de l'univers mis en scene par le poete, univers moral et politique.