thesis

Demetrios, "du style" , introduction, edition critique, traduction etcommentaire

Defense date:

Jan. 1, 1990

Edit

Institution:

Paris 4

Disciplines:

Authors:

Directors:

Abstract EN:

This thesis first aims at filling 2 gaps : the latest critical studies goes back to the beginning of the century (raderlacher, 1901; rhys roberts, 1902), and the latest french translations go to back further (durassier, guillemot, 1875); the greek text certainly needed updating, by taking into account the increasing number of manuscript data. The previous editors knew of some 15 manuscripts. We have been able to catalogue 45 copies, either complete or incomplete. The analysis of the new data sheds no new light on the question but enables us to complete the information found inthe par. Gr. 1741 by that of the marc. Gr. 508 -the latter dating back, according to us, not to the former but to a common source. 2ly, the study attemps to clarify the problem of the dating of the work. We think that it should be located (though not so early as grube thought (c. 270 bc), before the great rhetorical works of the lst bc. Lastly we endeavour to highlight the importance of this ionteresting and valuable little document. Based on a penetrating critical and often innovative interpretation of aristotle's texts devoted to style and ethics, on the exploiting of mainly peripatetic-inspired sources (but where stoic influences are traceable -notably mid-stoicism-), the treatise on style provides an original theory of expression, in direct opposition to the aristotelian philosophical model, half way between technical rhetoric and more purely literary conceptions.

Abstract FR:

Par ce travail, nous essayons de combler deux manques ; les dernieres editions critiques datent du debut du siecle (rademacher, 1901; rhys roberts, 1902). Les dernieres traductions francaises sont encore plus anciennes (durassier, guillemot, 1875). Or il etait necessaire d'actualiser le texte en tenant compte de l'enrichissement des donnees manuscrites. Sans revolutionner la question, l'apport du marc. Gr, 508, notamment, vient utilement completer le temoignage du par. Gr. 1741. Nous apportons aussi notre contribution a la question toujours debattue de la datation de l'ouvrage. Ce dernier, pensons-nous, sans etre aussi ancien que ne le pensait grube (ca. 270 av. J. C. ), doit etre situe avant les grands textes rhetoriques du 1er s. Av. J. C. Enfin, nous nous efforcons de mettre en lumiere la richesse et l'interet de ce petit ouvrage. Fonde sur une lecture souvent aigue, critique et novatrice des textes d'aristote consacres au style et a l'ethique, sur l'utilisation de sources a dominante peripateticienne mais ou l'on decele aussi des influences stoiciennes -notamment celle du stoicisme moyen-, le traite du style offre une theorie originale de l'expression, nettement opposee au modele philosophique aristotelicien ainsi qu'a l'esthetique du courant isocratique, au confluent de la rhetorique technicienne et de conceptions plus largement et plus librement litteraires.